<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ops Meta-Metrics: Velocity 2010 Slides</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kitchensoap.com/2010/06/24/ops-meta-metrics-velocity-2010-slides/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kitchensoap.com/2010/06/24/ops-meta-metrics-velocity-2010-slides/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on capacity planning and web operations.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:18:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norby</title>
		<link>http://www.kitchensoap.com/2010/06/24/ops-meta-metrics-velocity-2010-slides/comment-page-1/#comment-8079</link>
		<dc:creator>Norby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 04:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitchensoap.com/?p=483#comment-8079</guid>
		<description>Ed:

The key is not to come up with &quot;the&quot; number, but &quot;a&quot; number.  You run the tests all the time and watch for changes in trends.  If you are measuring load time constantly, you&#039;ll be able to see pretty much immediately when things change.  Even if tool A says, &quot;2.5 seconds&quot; and tool B says, &quot;3.5 seconds&quot;, if the time doubles when you deploy, I think it&#039;s pretty clear something went wrong.

-/\/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed:</p>
<p>The key is not to come up with &#8220;the&#8221; number, but &#8220;a&#8221; number.  You run the tests all the time and watch for changes in trends.  If you are measuring load time constantly, you&#8217;ll be able to see pretty much immediately when things change.  Even if tool A says, &#8220;2.5 seconds&#8221; and tool B says, &#8220;3.5 seconds&#8221;, if the time doubles when you deploy, I think it&#8217;s pretty clear something went wrong.</p>
<p>-/\/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.kitchensoap.com/2010/06/24/ops-meta-metrics-velocity-2010-slides/comment-page-1/#comment-8073</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 04:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitchensoap.com/?p=483#comment-8073</guid>
		<description>Hey John,

Caught your presentation at Velocity, loved it. I had a question, one that I can&#039;t seem to answer locally in Oz at the moment. 

We&#039;re using a number of tools to measure site load time - from Gomez to http://www.webpagetest.org/ . In the past we&#039;ve used Keynote and Webmetrics and probably more that I&#039;ve forgotten. 

What I struggle with - and I&#039;d love to know your approach is - every single tool gives a different load time. Even if we try to run the same test at the same time on the same day of the week I get a different number.

How do I come up with a definitive number? How do you do it?

It makes it very hard to judge whether a code change has improved site load time, or merely that we happened to run the test at a time when the test gave a quick response.

How do you guys do it?

Cheers
Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey John,</p>
<p>Caught your presentation at Velocity, loved it. I had a question, one that I can&#8217;t seem to answer locally in Oz at the moment. </p>
<p>We&#8217;re using a number of tools to measure site load time &#8211; from Gomez to http://www.webpagetest.org/ . In the past we&#8217;ve used Keynote and Webmetrics and probably more that I&#8217;ve forgotten. </p>
<p>What I struggle with &#8211; and I&#8217;d love to know your approach is &#8211; every single tool gives a different load time. Even if we try to run the same test at the same time on the same day of the week I get a different number.</p>
<p>How do I come up with a definitive number? How do you do it?</p>
<p>It makes it very hard to judge whether a code change has improved site load time, or merely that we happened to run the test at a time when the test gave a quick response.</p>
<p>How do you guys do it?</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kraig Amador</title>
		<link>http://www.kitchensoap.com/2010/06/24/ops-meta-metrics-velocity-2010-slides/comment-page-1/#comment-8070</link>
		<dc:creator>Kraig Amador</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 04:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitchensoap.com/?p=483#comment-8070</guid>
		<description>Excellent presentation. I especially liked the release log and correlation of release size and incident TTR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent presentation. I especially liked the release log and correlation of release size and incident TTR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

