<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The term &#8220;monitoring&#8221; needs clarification.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kitchensoap.com/2007/09/26/the-term-monitoring-needs-clarification/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kitchensoap.com/2007/09/26/the-term-monitoring-needs-clarification/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on capacity planning and web operations.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:07:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Mui</title>
		<link>http://www.kitchensoap.com/2007/09/26/the-term-monitoring-needs-clarification/comment-page-1/#comment-4415</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Mui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitchensoap.com/2007/09/26/the-term-monitoring-needs-clarification/#comment-4415</guid>
		<description>The BayLISA Monitoring SIG, which has been meeting for over a year now, classified Monitoring functionality into these four areas:

Generation
Collection
Analysis
Presentation

It isn&#039;t perfect, but it was the best we could do after much discussion and deliberation and hemming and hawing.  (For example, do &quot;Aggregation&quot; and &quot;Notification&quot; deserve separate mention, or are they functionally a subset of one of the above?)

So one of the upcoming goals of the SIG is to map popular monitoring tools against these classifications.  Obviously, some straddle more than one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BayLISA Monitoring SIG, which has been meeting for over a year now, classified Monitoring functionality into these four areas:</p>
<p>Generation<br />
Collection<br />
Analysis<br />
Presentation</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t perfect, but it was the best we could do after much discussion and deliberation and hemming and hawing.  (For example, do &#8220;Aggregation&#8221; and &#8220;Notification&#8221; deserve separate mention, or are they functionally a subset of one of the above?)</p>
<p>So one of the upcoming goals of the SIG is to map popular monitoring tools against these classifications.  Obviously, some straddle more than one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sysadmin@pt</title>
		<link>http://www.kitchensoap.com/2007/09/26/the-term-monitoring-needs-clarification/comment-page-1/#comment-3126</link>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin@pt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitchensoap.com/2007/09/26/the-term-monitoring-needs-clarification/#comment-3126</guid>
		<description>Indeed. I usually use the term monitoring when referring to server and netwrok health checking but I also see the term applied to the other options. Most people I know use it do define graphing tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. I usually use the term monitoring when referring to server and netwrok health checking but I also see the term applied to the other options. Most people I know use it do define graphing tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.587 seconds -->
